Monday, December 04, 2006

Comments are still here, but the post is gone

I've left the comments that were posted on the SJR agenda, because I wouldn't want to be accused of censorship, now would I? The agenda itself was just clutter, and didn't say anything important anyway.

I also don't want to remove the evidence the person left of genuine mental illness.

I want to point out that ALL of the comments that aren't clearly identified as being from me - the ones signed "Logically Negative" - were written by the same person. Even the supposedly "sensible" one signed "Stop Bashing..." was written by the same moron who wrote the insane rants.

I didn't know that when I replied to "Stop Bashing" but I do now. Jonathan.

Rich Miles

13 comments:

pitiful said...

Hey Rich, You really are such a blind MOUSE.

Your leader said, "I've been invited to attend/participate in the Southern Journalists Roundtable this Sunday and Monday in Chapel Hill, North Carolina."
Participate???
His word, participate.
No where, not one place does your agenda list your leader's name as a participant.
Attend????
His word, attend.
NO where does this agenda you provided show that Mark Nickolas even attended the event.
so ... stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

Maybe he is attending the SJR in the same fashion he attended the "CHARGE" to the KDP .. on his fat ass?

You and the other blind mice think he is some great political insider and he isn't.

You have the exact same mindset as some poor lonely person joining a cult. I feel so sorry for you, the only friend you have is your computer because even your leader bails on you in the "CHARGE."

Logically Negative said...

Jonathan, you are a pathetic little man. You don't even know how easily identified you are, do you?

I don't "follow" Mark - he's not my "leader" - I just like him, and admire much of what he does, though not all of it, and enjoy using his forum to say what I want to say.

You, on the other hand, are too young to recognize that JL is NOT going to be around much longer, and when he goes, so will you. He might actually survive - he's a crusty old bastard who has failed in life more times than you've brushed your teeth - but you and your career will be dead in the water. You'll be lucky if Mickey D's will hire you after JL falls.

Don't you know that at least two of your "colleagues" on the SCC have used the word "sociopath" to describe you? Frankly, it seems a nice word relative to your particular brand of dementia.

And when you get your ass handed to you, I'll survive too, and I'll dance on your professional grave, and laugh while I'm doing it.

Silly, silly boy....

Nickolas LIED by misleading said...

Rich

No, I don't feel bad that there was no evidence of a Southern Journalists Roundtable this weekend. No, I certainly do NOT feel it impractical to question the veracity of ANYTHING Mark Nickolas claims to participate in or have participated in. Including Nickolas' claim to be invited to "attend/participate." There is STILL no evidence he "attended" nor evidence that he "participated."

Mark Nickolas does NOT tell the truth. Mark Nickolas MISLEADS his readers on a constant basis. He MISLED the readers when HE wrote he had been invited to "attend/participate" in the Roundtable. In short, he LIED. He did NOT participate.

If Kyle Macy said, "I participated in the Final Four for UK." It would MEAN he PLAYED basketball for UK and it would not be a lie because he DID participate. It would NOT mean he drove by the game, or stayed in the parking lot while the game was being played and it would NOT mean he sat in the nose bleed section ... it would mean he PLAYED.

When Nickolas claims to be a participant in a Journalists Roundtable and because he misleads, prints half-truths and NO truths in his threads NATURALLY people who see clearly would question his veracity in that. I did, and WE ALL KNOW NOW ... that ... HE DID NOT PARTICIPATE. Rich, Mark Nickolas LIED AGAIN. Now, when Nickolas claims to have gone with Al Cross, it is hard to believe that a man like Al would associate himself with the LIKES of Nickolas UNLESS ... Al Cross found himself a BOY.

Rich, That makes YOUR LEADER A LIAR. Maybe you don't know this Rich but when YOU or Nickolas MISLEAD someone it is LYING!

Rich, I don't know you and I am glad I don't. Personally I don't associate with others that are so blind they AID in the COVER-UP of someone else's LIES. That would mean YOU aiding Nickolas in all of his many lies he has written on his blog.

Here's the way NORMAL people see this scenario, Nickolas spreads an untrue rumor on his blog. He deletes posts that prove he is wrong. He bans people that PROVE he is wrong. YOU and others (INCLUDING Nickolas - who posts comments under other names) AID in the UNTRUE rumor by ignoring reality. I've read your posts. You, nor Nickolas can stand the truth to come out.

Why? Well, first only an illogical person would prefer a lie and a rumor over the facts. Secondly, and this is the sad one, followers of such a malicious person FOLLOW because they have NO real friends, NO real life and are so afraid of losing the ONE AND ONLY connection to SOMETHING they act like you do. Simple. If I had a friend that mislead me as often as your leader misleads you, I would eliminate the friendship because I don't NEED to hang out with or follow liars, or malicious people.

I'm guessing you have LOW self esteem and are EXTREMELY desperate to FIT IN ANYWHERE even if that anywhere is in the nastiest blog on the world wide web. That's scary to you isn't Rich. The thought of eliminating your association with the ONLY THING IN YOUR LIFE. Don't worry, there are one or two more in that chatroom that are just as insecure as you.

Ya know Rich the way a leader of cult operates is this, they brainwash their followers with lies and BAN communication with anyone from the REAL WORLD ... sound familiar?

Mark is NOT an important blogger - he only has three followers. Mark is NOT a blogger with impact on Kentucky politics because only three people listen to him.

PS. It makes Mark look real desperate by his many deletions and bans. hahahahahaha... What a desperate fool he is and what a desperate fool his followers are. One more thing, when Mark wrote he was a "participant" in the SJR was a REAL BIG sign of one with issues of grandeur ... well he's YOUR leader.

PPS. Why don't YOU post on conservachick.com anymore Rich????? To many intellects over there?

PPS: Hey Rich, better go run I just heard Nickolas has more shit coming out of his mouth and he needs some TP ... Go run along and fetch it for him ...

Logically Negative said...

Well, Jonathan, so far that's 6 different user names you've hidden behind, here, on Leo, and on BGR.

I spoke to Ferrel Guillory, who confirmed that Mark was in Chapel Hill till yesterday about 3:00pm.

And yes you do know me - and you know I know it.

Get a life, and stop trying to bring down your betters.

Logically Negative said...

I might also add that your post this morning (12/5) answers questions that *I* never asked. Please, try to retain a bit of dignity. If you can.

like leader like follower said...

gee rich, you are just like your leader ... hey just b/c you delete doesn't mean it wasn't there. just b/c you say it, doesn't make it so. Since we know Al is pimping your leader - did he tell you to delete this???

Rich

No, I don't feel bad that there was no evidence of a Southern Journalists Roundtable this weekend. No, I certainly do NOT feel it impractical to question the veracity of ANYTHING Mark Nickolas claims to participate in or have participated in. Including Nickolas' claim to be invited to "attend/participate." There is STILL no evidence he "attended" nor evidence that he "participated."

Mark Nickolas does NOT tell the truth. Mark Nickolas MISLEADS his readers on a constant basis. He MISLED the readers when HE wrote he had been invited to "attend/participate" in the Roundtable. In short, he LIED. He did NOT participate.

If Kyle Macy said, "I participated in the Final Four for UK." It would MEAN he PLAYED basketball for UK and it would not be a lie because he DID participate. It would NOT mean he drove by the game, or stayed in the parking lot while the game was being played and it would NOT mean he sat in the nose bleed section ... it would mean he PLAYED.

When Nickolas claims to be a participant in a Journalists Roundtable and because he misleads, prints half-truths and NO truths in his threads NATURALLY people who see clearly would question his veracity in that. I did, and WE ALL KNOW NOW ... that ... HE DID NOT PARTICIPATE. Rich, Mark Nickolas LIED AGAIN. Now, when Nickolas claims to have gone with Al Cross, it is hard to believe that a man like Al would associate himself with the LIKES of Nickolas UNLESS ... Al Cross found himself a BOY.

Rich, That makes YOUR LEADER A LIAR. Maybe you don't know this Rich but when YOU or Nickolas MISLEAD someone it is LYING!

Rich, I don't know you and I am glad I don't. Personally I don't associate with others that are so blind they AID in the COVER-UP of someone else's LIES. That would mean YOU aiding Nickolas in all of his many lies he has written on his blog.

Here's the way NORMAL people see this scenario, Nickolas spreads an untrue rumor on his blog. He deletes posts that prove he is wrong. He bans people that PROVE he is wrong. YOU and others (INCLUDING Nickolas - who posts comments under other names) AID in the UNTRUE rumor by ignoring reality. I've read your posts. You, nor Nickolas can stand the truth to come out.

Why? Well, first only an illogical person would prefer a lie and a rumor over the facts. Secondly, and this is the sad one, followers of such a malicious person FOLLOW because they have NO real friends, NO real life and are so afraid of losing the ONE AND ONLY connection to SOMETHING they act like you do. Simple. If I had a friend that mislead me as often as your leader misleads you, I would eliminate the friendship because I don't NEED to hang out with or follow liars, or malicious people.

I'm guessing you have LOW self esteem and are EXTREMELY desperate to FIT IN ANYWHERE even if that anywhere is in the nastiest blog on the world wide web. That's scary to you isn't Rich. The thought of eliminating your association with the ONLY THING IN YOUR LIFE. Don't worry, there are one or two more in that chatroom that are just as insecure as you.

Ya know Rich the way a leader of cult operates is this, they brainwash their followers with lies and BAN communication with anyone from the REAL WORLD ... sound familiar?

Mark is NOT an important blogger - he only has three followers. Mark is NOT a blogger with impact on Kentucky politics because only three people listen to him.

PS. It makes Mark look real desperate by his many deletions and bans. hahahahahaha... What a desperate fool he is and what a desperate fool his followers are. One more thing, when Mark wrote he was a "participant" in the SJR was a REAL BIG sign of one with issues of grandeur ... well he's YOUR leader.

PPS. Why don't YOU post on conservachick.com anymore Rich????? To many intellects over there?

PPS: Hey Rich, better go run I just heard Nickolas has more shit coming out of his mouth and he needs some TP ... Go run along and fetch it for him ...

hahahahahaha said...

Hey Slick Rich, when you talked to Ferrel did he say Al's pimped out boy was there?

Did Ferrel say he PARTICIPATED? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

He did NOT participate. Look you are so high strung on the correct spellings and definitions of words yet you let Nickolas LIE by claiming to participate when AT BEST all he did was show UP with ... his pimp. You just sit at your computer SMILING like a lonely desperate man wanting some place to belong.

Old saying, when you lay down with shit, you wake up smelling like it.

Those were YOUR posts on conservachick.com weren't they??? They bore your name, Rich Miles.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Now I have TWO blogs I can LAUGH MY ASS OFF AT~~~~ snore

Logically Negative said...

I deleted nothing except a few spammed ads. Everything you've said here is still here. Including the long rambling diatribe you posted twice.

I wouldn't interfere with your effort to make yourself look genuinely unhinged. Keep posting - hardly anyone reads this site anyway, but of the few that do, most of them are going to think you're a real loon. Jonathan.

Yes, I posted a few things, maybe a total of three comments, on conservachick several weeks ago. If there's anything recent, it's forged.

Stop bashing & start Shedding said...

Rich,

I don't know what to say? Sure, I don't post much on any blogs and sure, I read blogs. The poster does not sound like a loon. The poster has made some valid points. Can you really not destinguish the valid points made by the poster?

I have read Nickolas' blog since June of 2005. Many of us in Kentucky seek a true non-partisan source for reliable information.

Nickolas claimed his blog would be hard-hitting and non-partisan.

Instead, I find a voice infecting Kentucky politics with more partisan banter without any reliable information. Face it, because he has turned his blog into a rumor mill the blog he operates is not a source for reliable information. Can you not see that?

So far on his site I have seen a reiteration of mainstream agenda filled parroting, maybe that was Al Cross' agenda?

It’s time Nickolas and you put your partisan views aside and tell the whole truth!

For the sake of the Commonwealth and the Republic, stop bashing and start shedding light on the issues!!

Logically Negative said...

Yes, he makes some points, but he's rambling on about stuff that even *I* don't agree with.

Mark was in Chapel Hill. He did, according to him, Al Cross, and Ferrel Guillory, participate. It was not open to the public. No video was taken of the event. I am much more inclined to believe ANY of the three people I mention above than a person who RAVES at me from behind THREE different anonymous names here, plus 2 or 3 others elsewhere. And really, what's the point of his supposed "good points"? That he thinks Mark lied about his attendance in Chapel Hill? Whether true or not, and I don't think it IS true, is it really worth all this energy aimed at ME, who is not responsible for what Mark Nickolas says or does in any case?

Yes, he's loony. That's my opinion and I'm not going to change it because yet another anonymous moron says I should.

What Mark does is nothing to do with me unless I choose to make it so with my comments. What I have said on BGR, with the exception of the few times I've had to apologize because I spoke too soon about something, I'm perfectly comfortable with.

Keeping quiet about what I see as wrong with our state and our nation is not the way I do things. In fact, I'd say it's a good definition of the exact opposite of the way I do things.

Now - this topic is officially over. Post all you want, you'll get no more replies from me.

holler boy said...

you really are paranoid. Heh, who cares. Hey, did you read the "comments" below your leader's LEO article at leoweekly.com? You are so gullible and eager to have a leader it is sad. You have been DUPED by Al Cross and Mark Nickolas.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

sam wise said...

PS, face it Rich, you are no different than your leader. You will NOT publish this post or the other post because you are following your leaders demands.

Did he tell you to get rid of the Agenda that does NOT have his name as a participant. YUP, you train well by your cult leader

Logically Negative said...

The two posts above this one are signed with false names. I published them voluntarily so that the few people who see them will know what a complete mental case I'm dealing with here. No further explanation needed.